Bridge contemporary issues, climate change apocalyptical. POST apocalyptic. CRITICAL ABOUT OTHER ARTIST why why why

Animate objects, Non-human materials. If a human made object is nonhuman. -> are we human -> then an object is a reflection of its maker. Or shows the human aspects in this object/ technology.
These object can consist of assemblages of technology each representing qualities of biases pf its maker.
If a maker propose a new narrative by focussing on the post human than this object that is lively showing a new way of life according to his/her {lifestyle}
A new form of contact, with these objects to understand nonhuman relation, what could such a short moment of interaction mean and bring towards the human. Should the human even be there while the non humans communicate?

Text about the holobiont individuality. He states that we are no individuals due to our symbiont bacteria that lives in our digestive system. In An example he writes about a pea aphid that lives with symbiont bacteria that give certain quality to the aphid. Wasp infect these aphids with their eggs, which on their turn eat the aphids from the inside. There is this bacteria that makes the aphid immune for this parasite. However this bacteria needs to have a symbiont bacteria to produce this ‘vaccine’ for the aphid.

Je bent wat je eet. The bacteria create certain qualities and can express this in for example Mice, they got bigger bones using a septic bacteria. So food got work like a way to alter the body on a natural way?

Bacterial metabolism

Showing symbiont animated object could speak to the audience as informative new perspective on living. With or without human interference.

NEGARESTANI: he also questions wether the human is the right model for conceptualising of intelligence,

Plastic eating microorganisms inside the human body. Possible energy harvesting. Combining blinds with microorganism to create a sustainable yet replaceable system of light controlement.

Microorganism that eat plastics inside our digestive system.

Showing a new narrative that a body could compass. How our relation with our material body could design a better understanding of the particles that surround us. Body enhancement through evolution of our symbiont micro organisms.

Investigate a structure of an organism.

New narrative of capitalism watching capitalism and greed through microorganisms

Simularum

Attitude towards graduation
-reading and a continuously flow of writing
-research based project
-investigating future versions of capitalism through anthropology

Artistic vision
-artists I relate to
-by using technology as means to investigate post humanism and the anthroposcene
-researching nature, micro organisms, to find new technologies/mechanisms
-proposing a new narrative through watching and experiencing art


Revisit the anthroposcene through the anthropology of humans. Opposing new narratives by researching human centered design And or microorganisms


“The earliest tool were simply extensions of moving human organs.” Page292
Leroi-Gourhan:
“The way the way inventions influenced each other has not been studied sufficientlyband we don’t seem to tak note that , without the wheel, we would not have the locomotive.”

Again, technology is biology.
Traces of infrastructures with purposes
transformable, expandable working pavilion
external, function oriented add-on
external-internal architectural relationship with sunlight/light